Making the case for less e-waste

L-R: Anastasia Dunca, Chris Rabe, and Jasmin Liu in the locking dock of MIT’s Stata Center where students and faculty go “crufting.” Rabe facilitated an interdisciplinary working group comprised of undergraduate and graduates students known as SERC Scholars to co-author an open-source case study on the electronic hardware waste life cycle and climate justice.
Gretchen Ertl
L-R: Anastasia Dunca, Chris Rabe, and Jasmin Liu in the locking dock of MIT’s Stata Center where students and faculty go “crufting.” Rabe facilitated an interdisciplinary working group comprised of undergraduate and graduates students known as SERC Scholars to co-author an open-source case study on the electronic hardware waste life cycle and climate justice.
Gretchen Ertl

SERC Scholars co-authored an open-source case study on the electronic hardware waste life cycle and climate justice.

Danna Lorch | MIT Schwarzman College of Computing
November 18, 2024
Categories: College News, Research, Students

As part of the Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing (SERC) at the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, students from different parts of MIT came together to write a case study about the environmental and climate justice implications of the electronics hardware life cycle.
 
Although it’s not uncommon for graduate students to co-author case studies, it’s unusual for undergraduates to earn this opportunity — and for their audience to be other undergraduates around the world.
 
“Our team was insanely interdisciplinary,” said Anastasia Dunca, a junior studying computer science and one of the co-authors. “I joined the SERC Scholars Program because I liked the idea of being part of a cohort from across MIT working on a project that utilized all of our skillsets. It also helps [undergraduates] learn the ins and outs of computing ethics research.”
 
SERC Scholars are a community of students that examine the most urgent problems humans face in the digital landscape. Scholars join a different topical working group each fall and present a final project each spring.
 
Case study co-author Jasmin Liu, an MBA student in the MIT Sloan School of Management, saw the program as a platform to learn about the intersection of technology, society, and ethics. “I met team members spanning computer science, urban planning, to art/culture/technology. I was excited to work with a diverse team because I know complex problems must be approached with many different perspectives. Combining my background in humanities and business with the expertise of others allowed us to be more innovative and comprehensive.”
 
Christopher Rabe, a SERC postdoctoral associate during that time who facilitated the group said, “I let the students take the lead on identifying the topic and conducting the research.” His goal for the group was to challenge students across disciplines to develop a working definition of climate justice.

From mining to e-waste

The SERC Scholars crafted their case study over the 2023-2024 academic year. From Mining to E-Waste: The Environmental and Climate Justice Implications of the Electronics Hardware Life Cycle was published in Summer 2024 by the MIT Case Studies Series in Social and Ethical Responsibilities in Computing.
 
The ongoing series, published on an open-source platform, is enabling undergraduate instructors worldwide to incorporate research-based education materials on computing ethics into their existing class syllabi.
 
The case study breaks down the electronics life cycle from mining to manufacturing, usage, and disposal. It offers an in-depth look at how this cycle promotes inequity in the Global South. Mining for the average of 60 minerals that power everyday devices lead to illegal deforestation, compromising air quality in the Amazon, and triggering armed conflict in Congo. Manufacturing leads to proven health risks for both formal and informal workers, some of whom are child laborers.
 
Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy are proposed as mechanisms for analyzing environmental and climate justice issues in the electronics life cycle. Rather than posing solutions, the case study offers readers entry points for further discussion and for assessing their own individual responsibility as producers of e-waste.

Crufting and crafting the case study

Dunca joined Rabe’s working group last September, intrigued by the invitation to conduct a rigorous literature review examining issues like data center resource and energy use, manufacturing waste, ethical issues with AI, and climate change. Rabe quickly realized that a common thread amongst all participants was an interest in understanding and reducing e-waste and its impact on the environment.
 
“I came in with the idea of us co-authoring a case study,” Rabe said. However, the writing-intensive process was initially daunting to those students who were used to conducting applied research. Once Rabe created sub-groups with discrete tasks, the steps for researching, writing, and iterating a case study became more approachable.
 
For Ellie Bultena, an undergraduate student studying linguistics and philosophy and a contributor to the study, that meant conducting field research on the loading dock of MIT’s Stata Center, where students and faculty go “crufting” through piles of clunky printers, broken computers, and used lab equipment discarded by the Institute’s labs, departments, and individual users.
 
Although not a formally sanctioned activity on-campus, “crufting” is the act of gleaning usable parts from these junk piles to be repurposed into new equipment or art. Bultena’s respondents, who opted to be anonymous, said that MIT could do better when it comes to the amount of e-waste generated and suggested that formal strategies could be implemented to encourage community members to repair equipment more easily or recycle more formally.
 
Rabe, now an education program director at the Environmental Solutions Initiative, is hopeful that through the Zero-Carbon Campus Initiative, which commits the Institute to eliminate all direct emissions by 2050, MIT will ultimately become a model for other higher education institutions.
 
Although the group lacked the time and resources to travel to communities in the Global South, which they profiled in the case study, they leaned into exhaustive secondary research, collecting data on how some countries are irresponsibly dumping e-waste. In contrast, others have developed alternative solutions that can be duplicated elsewhere and scaled.
 
“We source materials, manufacture them, and then throw them away,” Lelia Hampton said bluntly. Hampton, a PhD candidate in electrical engineering and computer science and another co-author, jumped at the opportunity to serve in a writing role, bringing together the sub-groups research findings. “I’d never written a case study, and it was exciting. Now I want to write 10 more.”
 
The content directly informed Hampton’s dissertation research, which “looks at applying machine learning to climate justice issues such as urban heat islands.” She said that writing a case study that is accessible to general audiences upskilled her for the non-profit she’s determined to start. “It’s going to provide communities with free resources and data needed to understand how they are impacted by climate change and begin to advocate against injustice,” Hampton explained.
 
Dunca, Rabe, Bultena, and Hampton are joined on the case study by fellow authors Madeline Schlegal, a Northeastern co-op student; Jasmin Liu, an MBA student in the MIT Sloan School of Management; Mrinalini Singha, a graduate student in the Art, Culture, and Technology program; Sungmoon Lim, a graduate student in Urban Studies and Planning and EECS; and Lauren Higgins, an undergraduate student majoring in political science.

Taking the case study to classrooms around the world

Although PhD candidates have contributed to previous case studies in the series, this publication is the first to be co-authored with MIT undergraduates. Like any other peer-reviewed journal, before publication, the SERC Scholars’ case study was anonymously reviewed by senior scholars drawn from various fields.
 
The series editor, David Kaiser, also served as one of SERC’s inaugural associate deans and helped shape the program. “The case studies, by design, are short, easy to read, and don’t take up lots of time,” Kaiser explained. “They are gateways for students to explore, and instructors can cover a topic that has likely already been on their mind.” This semester, Kaiser, the Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science and a professor of physics, is teaching STS 004, an undergraduate introduction to science, technology, and society. The last month of the semester will be dedicated wholly to SERC case studies, one of which is: From Mining to E-Waste.
 
Hampton was visibly moved to hear that the case study is being used at MIT but also by some of the 250,000 visitors to the SERC platform, many of whom are based in the Global South and directly impacted by the issues she and her cohort researched. “Many students are focused on climate, whether through computer science, data science, or mechanical engineering. I hope that this case study educates them on environmental and climate aspects of e-waste and computing.”