Envisioning the Future of Computing Prize: Call for Submissions

The Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing (SERC), a cross-cutting initiative within the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing, in collaboration with the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, invites MIT students to envision the future of computing.

Tell us your ideas, aspirations, and vision for what you think the future holds. The winning entry of the Envisioning the Future of Computing Prize competition will be awarded a grand prize of $10K. In addition, we will recognize two runner ups with $5K each, and up to 5 honorable mentions with $500 each.

Thank you to MAC3 Impact Philanthropies for their generous support of the Envisioning the Future of Computing Prize.

Apply Here

The Assignment

Artificial intelligence will transform every sector of human society in fundamental ways.

Some transformations may be for the worse. We may see job displacement and economic disruption. We may face biased decision-making in critical systems. We may lose human agency in essential services. And unchecked AI deployment may exacerbate existing inequalities. These concerns are also worth examining.

But some transformations may be for the better. We may solve previously intractable problems. We may unlock human potential in unprecedented ways. We may create more equitable and effective systems. And AI may help us address our most pressing global challenges. These possibilities are eminently worth exploring.

Now you can win a prize for making the case for positive transformation.

In no more than 3,000 words —

Identify which sector (healthcare, education, agriculture, climate, governance, arts, infrastructure, justice, transportation, etc.) stands to gain the highest net positive impact from AI, and describe at least one particular AI application within that sector that could realistically be developed or deployed within the next 5-10 years.
Analyze the specific, tangible ways this AI application could benefit individuals, communities, or society within your chosen sector. What problems does it solve? What opportunities does it create?
Address the flipside: What could go wrong? Critically examine the risks, ethical concerns, and potential negative consequences specific to deploying AI in this sector.
Make the affirmative case: Explain why, despite these risks, the net effects could still be positive with appropriate safeguards, design choices, or implementation strategies, and why this sector offers the greatest overall benefit..

Your submission should present a substantive, evidence-based analysis focused on realistic, near-term possibilities. Ground your arguments in sector-specific knowledge, real-world examples, technical feasibility, case studies, or data. You are encouraged to include relevant visualizations, frameworks, or empirical evidence. Please also include a one-page summary of your analysis (repetition between summary and main text is acceptable).

The deadline to submit is February 8, 2026 by 11:59 pm.

Goals of the Prize

We want to encourage MIT students to think in a creative, informed, and rigorous way about the societal benefits and costs of the technologies they are or will be developing.
We want to show MIT students that MIT values such thinking.
We want to show the outside world that MIT values such thinking.

Eligibility

This prize is open to all presently-enrolled MIT students, undergraduate or graduate. You are free to enter as an individual or as a team. If you entered last year, you are welcome to enter again this year.

If you have been a previous runner-up or prize winner, you are ineligible to enter. Honorable mentions may apply again with a new essay.

Learn more about our past winners and read their essays:

Help With Your Essay

A series of workshops hosted by SERC group leaders will be held throughout the January Independent Activities Period to teach students the skill of writing a technology impact paper and to offer help and advice on creating such a paper for the prize. Students interested in submitting an entry are highly encouraged to attend a workshop.

The workshops will provide general information on the competition and guidelines on how to write this kind of paper. This will also be a time to discuss ideas. Workshop slots are limited and will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.

Submission Details

All submissions should adhere to the guidelines below. Any submissions that do not follow these guidelines may be disqualified from the competition.

The naming convention of your file should be ‘Title of Essay_MIT ID#’.
The file name should not include your name, as all entries will be judged anonymously.
The file should be a PDF.

Further, to ensure academic integrity, students will attest to the following on submission:

All of the writing here is my own. This means that anything quoted verbatim from another source appears within quotation marks and is accompanied by a footnote¹ that identifies the source. It means that I have not paraphrased another person’s writing without making it explicit that I am doing so — I recognize that changing the words does not make it my writing. It means that I have not drawn text from an AI without making it explicit that I am doing so. And it means that whenever I have drawn insights or ideas from another source (including friends, including anonymous authors of material on the Internet), I have credited that source in a footnote.

Prizes

The following prizes will be awarded:

$10K to the winning entry
$5K each to two runner ups
$500 each to up to 5 honorable mentions

Undergraduates will receive their money just prior to graduation.

Questions? Contact us at serc@mit.edu.

Judging

Stage One

All entries will be judged anonymously by a panel of faculty. The prize administrators will ensure that any scores issued by members of the panel to their own students will be discarded. The panel will judge entries by whether they are:

Clearly Articulated: Does this essay clearly explain, in terms accessible to an educated layperson (think of someone who has completed the General Institute Requirements at MIT, but is not working in this area), what the technology is, and (if undeveloped) what it would take to develop it? Does this essay clearly explain what the social effects of the technology could be, and how they could be on-balance positive?
Thorough: Does this essay make a serious effort to consider all of the social effects of technology, good and bad? Does the essay bring sufficient detail to its analysis, while remaining efficient and succinct?
Grounded: Is development of the technology described in this essay feasible? Are the social effects described in this essay likely? Does this essay back up its claims about feasibility and likelihood with evidence and/or argument?
Imaginative: Does the essay show imagination in thinking through the ways in which the technology it describes may impact our lives?
Inspiring: Could this essay inspire people to work on developing the technology it describes in the way it describes, and inspire people to conduct similar analyses of other technologies?

Stage Two

The judging panel will invite up to three finalists to a final round and award ceremony taking place live in April. At the event, each finalist will give a 20-minute presentation on their entry. Their final score, determining the winner, will be 75% of their original score + 25% of their presentation score.

¹Name of author, name of piece, place of publication, date of publication

Apply Here